
Jana and I celebrated our anniversary, and it was the second day of my vegan trial. Jana was very accommodating, but I realized that my dietary choices did impact our ability to enjoy a meal together as we had in the past. We’ve always enjoyed eating out together, but my vegan parameter severely constrained our restaurant options.
I should clarify at this point that I’m not being critical of veganism here. I’m communicating my personal experience as honestly as possible, and I hope that no one feels that I’m disrespecting their life choices.
I asked Jana if she would be interested in eating at the Tibet-Nepal House in downtown Pasadena. Because there were a lot of vegetarian choices, I thought there would be good vegan options as well. Ultimately, however, the vegan dishes I selected were much blander and uninteresting than even the vegetarian dishes I’ve eaten at similar places in the past.
Partly, I think this was poor choice on my part. In spite of its Buddhist heritage, animal protein and fat sources are extremely important in Tibetan cuisine. When I talked to the waiter, I discovered that almost all of the vegetarian items had at least some butter or milk in them. There were probably other cuisines I could’ve suggested to Jana, if I had researched a little more beforehand.
So, today I learned that *for me,* as a foodie who previously could go to just about any restaurant and enjoy any item on a menu, there is a considerable cost in terms of freedom of selection. And in a culture in which enjoying particular foods together is an important ritual of social cohesion, I am already feeling other costs of adherence to a vegan diet.
This communicates to me that going vegan is not something that anyone does lightly. This is no casual choice.
There was some awesome food today, too. I started the day with the steel cut oats and fresh berries pictured above, and ended it with the amazing sorbets (tomato, ginger plum, and tamarind pepper) pictured below. Jana’s flight of fortified wines was also vegan.
