Religion, SF, and Other Speculative Fictions.


Mind on Fire random header image

Eight Things Barack Obama has Done to Make the World a More Peaceful Place.

Posted by John on October 9th, 2009 at 3:56 pm · 59 Comments

There is a refrain I encountered over and over across the Internet and in the media today: it says that President Obama has offered nothing more than speeches and vision in the cause of peace. Now, I’m not arguing that he has done enough to merit the Nobel Peace Prize, but his administration has *taken definitive action* to make the world a more peaceful place than the one left by his predecessor.

1. Announced Unequivocal End to Torture, Ordered the Closing of Guantanamo and the Closing of Secret Prisons.

Three for the price of one!

2. Improved Relations with Iran.

Remember when we were worried about a potential invasion of Iran while we were already mired in Iraq and Afghanistan and John “Bomb Bomb Iran” McCain? Instead, we now have one-on-one talks between Iranian and American envoys.

Tehran’s decision to agree to the US’s request for a one-on-one meeting, specifically tailored to discuss Iran’s nuclear program, may come as a shock to the hawkish critics of Obama’s Iran policy. They have painted the Iranian government as rigid and inflexible.

3. Improved U.S. Policy on Climate Change.

In addition to the effects that we will see from the administration’s acceptance of human-influenced climate change, Obama’s administration is already working to improve the global climate through a very real $15 billion injection for alternative energy and transportation. Obama is also responsible for the following:

launched high-speed rail, exercised the power to declare carbon dioxide a pollutant, sought a low-emissions zone for 200 miles surrounding our coasts, enacted the toughest auto-emissions standards in U.S. history, and begun converting the auto industry to electric vehicle production. He’s preserved two million acres of wilderness and a thousand miles of rivers.

Those actions, which occurred through the Stimulus Bill, the federal budget, and number of executive orders, all have a positive impact on the global climate.

4. Set a Timetable for Exiting Iraq.

Thereby ending America’s bloodiest conflict since Vietnam.

5. Improved Relations with Russia.

Which not only means less tension with the world’s second most powerful military, but also improving conditions for two other key concerns for global peace efforts:

Obama has already improved the atmosphere for cooperation with Russia, which is key to diplomatic efforts to curb Iranian and North Korean nuclear ambitions.

6. Made the Rights of Women around the World a Core Component of U.S. Foreign Policy:

Clinton and Obama jointly deserve credit for this, and Clinton deserves it for much of the Obama administration’s foreign policy successes. American prioritization of the welfare of women is already impacting areas as diverse as microlending, AIDS, the sex-trade, and the prosecution of perpetrators of widespread rape and mutilation of women.

Clinton says preventing the exploitation and marginalization of girls is no longer an afterthought but a core foreign policy objective of the United States, which is co-sponsoring a Security Council resolution on the issue next week.

7. Improved Relations with the Islamic World.

Obama has made speeches to far-reaching Muslim audiences and has backed his words with by reversing the Bush policies that made many suspicious of America to begin with.

President Obama made his most direct outreach to Muslims around the world Monday…Bush’s invasion of Iraq, imprisonment of Muslims at Guantanamo Bay, isolation of Iran, and support for Israel in its relations with the Palestinians and in the war with Hezbollah made many in Islamic nations believe that his administration was hostile to their religion.

Obama has reached out to Iran, ordered the closing of the military prison at Guantanamo Bay, and taken an early interest in resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict with the appointment of a Middle East envoy. His aides have outlined a new approach to Muslim countries that would reach beyond confronting terrorism to include a set of mutual interests on trade, education and health care.

8. Made Progress towards Greater Cooperation on Limiting Nuclear Proliferation.

From the Financial Times:

Mr Obama, who became the first US president to chair the UN Security Council, won unanimous support for a resolution that Washington said should lead to tighter controls on weapons states, an end to loopholes exploited by countries such as Iran and a lower risk of new nuclear arms race.

“The historic resolution we just adopted enshrines our shared commitment to a goal of a world without nuclear weapons,” Mr Obama said. “And it brings Security Council agreement on a broad framework for action to reduce nuclear dangers as we work toward that goal.”

Rhetoric Means Something on the Global Stage:

And Obama’s rhetoric means something more because he is backing them with actual policy changes, but in the international arena, talking about global partnership and replacing military threats with invitations to discussion really do mean something. In at least one way, peace is about more talk, if the talking is the promotion of an environment and the strengthening of relationships that lead towards increased cooperation and a reduction in conflict.

Again, I’m not saying that any of this merits a Nobel Peace Prize; but given the above, I don’t see how anyone can say that President Obama and his administration have done absolutely nothing to make the world a more peaceful place.

Tags: Current Events · Obama · Peace; conflict resolution.

59 responses so far ↓

  • 1 Rich // Oct 9, 2009 at 4:07 pm

    Well stated John. For the most part, the collective rest of the world breathed a huge sigh of relief when 8 years of Republican insanity came to an end, and this award certainly reflects some of that.

  • 2 leisurelyviking // Oct 9, 2009 at 4:51 pm

    I think #1 is more impressive on paper than in actuality, as the administration is fighting tooth and nail to avoid accountability for torture, refusing to release photos and information, resisting investigations into treatment at Bagram prison, and throwing out whole court cases related to the extraordinary rendition program by using the “state secrets” line. Congress is currently renewing 3 provisions of the PATRIOT act and I sure hope they manage to pass some amendments to reform it as well…

    The other stuff I can get behind.

  • 3 G // Oct 9, 2009 at 7:34 pm

    well said

  • 4 John // Oct 9, 2009 at 7:43 pm

    Rich, amen to that!

    leisurelyviking, I agree that he’s become protective of executive power now (predictably, to me), but he’s still a vast improvement over the Bush admin. Remember Cheney’s legal goons like John Yoo and Alberto Gonzalez? We now have a government that is against torture in firmly voiced principle, and we can at least call it hypocritical (sad, tho, that this is an improvement).

  • 5 Daniel // Oct 9, 2009 at 7:48 pm

    Pretty weak. I admit he has advanced Peace, but to be given such a prestigious award truly diminishes its prestige.

  • 6 Noli Irritare Leones » Blog Archive » Links: Nobel Peace Prize, Spanish immersion, Gene Sharp, and OK Cupid // Oct 10, 2009 at 7:50 am

    [...] John, from my own meeting, on Eight Things Barack Obama has Done to Make the World a More Peaceful Place. [...]

  • 7 Brendan // Oct 14, 2009 at 11:56 am

    Obama has done nothing to improve relations with Iran…. they are a rogue nation who will do the exact opposite of what they promise.
    Relations with Russia are not improving enough to constitute any sort of recognition…
    Giving two speeches on reducing nuclear proliferation does not do anything.

    If these are the reasons he was given a noble prize the other nominees should be insulted.

    Fuck Obama.

  • 8 Jen G. // Oct 14, 2009 at 2:21 pm

    I agree that there are a lot of things to admire about Pres. Obama. He is one of the most eloquent, engaging speakers I have ever heard. But concerning foreign affairs, he makes me a little nervous. Let me explain. When speaking of his dreams of a world without nuclear weapons. This sounds nice, who wouldn’t want that, but it seems a little simplistic. If every nuclear bomb was destroyed tomorrow, the technology and knowledge of how to produce them would not be. Neither would the people who are controlling them. It would only mean that the law-abiding countries would be without nukes, and those countries who are going to produce them anyways won’t be. He talks as if it was only the nukes that were the problem, and not the people developing/controlling them. Bad people are always going to exist, no matter how much we wish they wouldn’t. After listening to one of the President’s speeches, I am often mesmerized. But afterwards I have to do a reality check, and when I do, often his pretty words don’t stack up. It’s a bit like he’s super man with his cape, and he’s going to do what no else could, and fix everything and anything, with no side effects. If only it were that simple.

    This is why, especially concerning foreign affairs, Pres. Obama makes me a little nervous.

  • 9 John // Oct 14, 2009 at 2:38 pm

    Jen, thanks for your comment. I’ve long been interested in nuclear nonproliferation policity, and to the best of my understanding, most US foreign policy regarding nuclear weaponry aims at doing several things: 1) reducing existing stockpiles (the U.S. and Russia still have thousands of weapons loosely aimed at each other), 2) controlling and tracking the dismantled weapons so that they don’t fall into the wrong hands, 3) controlling the spread of nuclear weaponry and technology to other countries and non-state actors, and 4) limiting or eliminating the testing of nuclear weapons. The rate of progress may change between administrations, but the trajectory seems to be remain relatively consistent, even going back to the middle of Reagan’s second term.

    I was curious about Obama’s words on the topic, and found the following, and it seems to fit with what I’ve described above:

    So today, I state clearly and with conviction America’s commitment to seek the peace and security of a world without nuclear weapons. (Applause.) I’m not naive. This goal will not be reached quickly –- perhaps not in my lifetime. It will take patience and persistence. But now we, too, must ignore the voices who tell us that the world cannot change. We have to insist, “Yes, we can.” (Applause.)

    Now, let me describe to you the trajectory we need to be on. First, the United States will take concrete steps towards a world without nuclear weapons. To put an end to Cold War thinking, we will reduce the role of nuclear weapons in our national security strategy, and urge others to do the same. Make no mistake: As long as these weapons exist, the United States will maintain a safe, secure and effective arsenal to deter any adversary, and guarantee that defense to our allies –- including the Czech Republic. But we will begin the work of reducing our arsenal.

  • 10 Jen G. // Oct 14, 2009 at 3:32 pm

    John,

    Thanks for your response to mine. I really respect that you are so willing to have discussions with people who sees things differently from you, (albeit polite peeps, can’t blame you for that!) whether it be in a political or religious discussion. You have my respect.

    I am still unclear about some of the language in Obama’s speech that you referred to. I’m curious as to how you might interpret it, because to me it seems like a lot of ambiguous statements. Specifically the following: “we will reduce the role of nuclear weapons in our national security strategy, and urge others to do the same.” -How is he going to go about doing that? What does “urge others to do the same” translate into? Any thoughts?

    Thanks again for engaging in this. Unfortunately it seems that with a lot of peeps if you disagree with them on a political matter, there goes the relationship. I have friends that are both adamantly conservative and liberal that I feel like I cannot have these kind of conversations with because they take things personal that have nothing to do with them, and things can get heated. (Brendan’s comment above might be an example of that!) I think that’s a very sad thing, and a big part of what alienates the political parties and individuals within them from each other.

  • 11 John // Oct 14, 2009 at 4:57 pm

    Thanks, Jen–you have my respect as well! :)

    I agree that much of the language is still vague, which is typical of broad policy setting speeches. He talks about establishing and strengthening multi-national agreements and institutions designed to fight nuclear proliferation. These are set up to do two things: 1) to share information between countries that allow them to identify risks and targets and to help military, intelligence and law enforcement agencies to cooperate, 2) have member nations commit to not introduce or to reduce nuclear weapons in their own areas. Usually leaders set broad policy goals then their bureaucrats and appointees step in to hash out the details.

    Examples include the following:

    - The US and Russia are currently working on an agreement to reduce their respective stockpiles by a third, to about 1,500 warheads each.
    - As stated above, the Obama foreign policy team is trying to hammer out a framework that the members of the UN Security Council can agree to, and cooperation between the US, China, and Russia is vital on containing nukes where Iran and North Korea are concerned.
    - Some of the agreements set up government bodies that do really boring but vitally important stuff, like improving accounting practices among nuclear states so that warheads from stockpiles don’t go missing, or sharing banking information so that they can track possible transactions for the parts to make nuclear weapons.

    Basically, Obama’s making non-proliferation more of a visible priority than the Bush administration did, and this means more high level engagement and focus on the issue which leads to more resources being devoted to the sorts of agencies I mentioned above. So in this way, broad policy decisions with goals can translate to actual changes, and so far, it looks like Obama is following through on these priorities.

  • 12 John // Oct 14, 2009 at 5:00 pm

    Again, folks, I’m not arguing in favor of Obama getting the prize, I’m just saying that the Obama administration’s policies are moving the world towards one where the US is emphasizing the working out of differences diplomatically (i.e., peaceful means) instead of one where we threaten and use military force with reckless abandon (i.e., under Bush).

    One of the things about peace is that it takes soft outreach and talk and time. It’s very easy when you’re a strong country to bring out the guns for short-term gain.

  • 13 Jen G. // Oct 14, 2009 at 5:59 pm

    John,

    Thanks for going into some detail on that. I agree with everything you said. But I would just comment that while I believe peace, and negotiations, and ‘a soft touch’, as you put it, are vitally important, they don’t have much meaning when you find yourself dealing with individuals and countries that just don’t care about that sort of thing, and they’re definitely out there. I do believe that the strategies you mentioned will do well in dealing with most countries, they are the ideal. And I applaud Obama for working towards that. I just worry a little as to if he has a back-up plan in case those peaceful strategies and negotiations don’t work with a certain country, like one that doesn’t pay any attention to nonproliferation. I’m not saying I have the answer for how to act in that situation, but I sure hope he does.

  • 14 xJane // Oct 15, 2009 at 9:37 am

    Thank you, John. I retract any prior arguments against the awarding of the award that I made; for others, most were similar to Daniel @5′s argument.

  • 15 CK // Feb 9, 2010 at 5:10 pm

    I saw a link for a website about Barrak Obama being the anti Christ! the people who made that wedsite must not be very smart, because the big thing that stuck out to me is that the anti Christ takes his power in JERULSAHEM, not Amaica (which is where he is president of) I think that was just stupid, and offendeng! (>-_-)> -KIrby

  • 16 john // Mar 11, 2010 at 12:20 pm

    bush is a retard n should have been impeached, he left all this shit for obama to clean up n he can only start off slow. if we don’t get nuked by the end of his term consider it a victory, b/c we pissed alot of countries off under both bush’s terms but mainly bush jr..

  • 17 george // Mar 30, 2010 at 6:34 pm

    Other countries are laughing at us for making Obama our president. Bush wasn’t perfect, but Obama is a bad bad choice.

  • 18 And we become silhouettes when our bodies finally go // May 17, 2010 at 8:02 pm

    [...] Sources: http://www.stopjuststop.com/2009/11/91-things-obama-has-done-critique.html and http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/promises/ and http://www.mindonfire.com/2009/10/09/eight-things-barack-obama-has-done-to-make-the-world-a-more-pea… [...]

  • 19 Dustin // Jun 7, 2010 at 1:08 pm

    Terrible article — overstated in almost every way. #1 isn’t even correct considering Guantanamo Bay is STILL OPEN.

  • 20 John // Jun 7, 2010 at 1:26 pm

    Dustin, terrible comment–overstated in almost every way! :P I’m just kidding. But it is pretty heavy handed in its dismissal, considering there are 7 other points, and that #1 was true when I wrote this article in October 2009.

    I’d be happy to hear specifically how you disagree with my article’s main argument that Obama’s “administration has *taken definitive action* to make the world a more peaceful place than the one left by his predecessor.”

  • 21 DCarley // Jun 21, 2010 at 6:05 pm

    May I try to help you realize the insanity of your belief about Mr. Obama? (once I stop laughing)
    1. Our enemies will still torture and kill us and our soldiers because we are the infidels. Those so-called torture methods help us to gather intelligence that helps us fight them before they get us. And as for closing Guantanamo…its still open….and some of the released prisoners are back fighting us again. How’s that for peace?

    2. Iran laughs at us while they continue to do what they want. They make threats towards us every time we threaten them with sanctions. We are no closer to Iran than before Bush or Clinton. And they still want Israel wiped off the map. How’s that for peace?

    3. Climate change is now formally been debunct. A fable. A methodoly to gain control of the world’s resources. Is it getting warmer? Probably. Is it man’s fault? Not a chance. The elites of the world want people like you pressing their agenda for them so they can do what they want. How’s that for peace?

    4. Exiting Iraq. I’ll believe it whwen I see it. Even if he wanted to, he can’t. Bush got us in. Not probabl;e that anyone can really get us out where no US presence will be there. Our soldires will still be fighting (and dying) and trying to keep the country from falling into Iran’s hands. (See #2 for more details) How’s that for peace?

    5. Since Feurher Obama has taken control…Russia and Iran are now friends. They have been bitter enemies for thousands of years until the last few years. Now Russia sells missles, components, and SAM units to Iran for “protection.” Russia threatens the US more now more than ever. You probably should read the news before making comments about such things. Russia wants us minimized. How’s that for peace?

    6. And so I don’t do exactly what you have done with your errant comments about an Obama-made world peace…I do not know what impact his agenda for woment has made throughtout the world. I will say that I don’t believe you do either if you reading and listening to CNN, MSNBC, or the MSM news outlets. Of course, the world is a rosy place without that damned Bush in office. I will also say AIDS overall is increasing, sex trafficing is still happening, and honor-killings are increasing worldwide. How’s that for peace?

    7. Just so you’ll know….the Muslim world laughs at Obama. His reputation in the Muslim world is in decline because he has not acted fast enough to destroy Israel, implement shariah law in America, or get the US out of the Middle East. They see him as a weak president and they see an opportunity to make great gains in overtaking America for their religion. By the way…I truly believe Obama is Muslim. He has never outright denied it and when he says he is a Christian, remember he learned his Christianity from Jeremiah Wright and his hate-speech. Anyway, don’t you know Muslims can lie if it advances their ultimate agenda? Look up the principle of Al-Takeyya in the koran. How’s that for peace?

    8. I agree with you on his trying to limit nuclear proliferation. However, as with most other things…Mr. Obama is either very stupid thinking other countruies will ever live up to any agreement they sign…or he is very smart because he wants America to decline and to limit our ability to defend ourselves is one way to accomplish that desire. How’s that for peace?

    Obama is an idiot, tyrant, far-left kook who absolutely belives what he is doing is the right way. He, along with most other liberally educated people, have been brainwashed by the likes of Saul Alinsky, William Ayers, and others who hate America. Obama is just following his mentors as instructed. I must say he is doing so most effectively.

    I am sure he appreciates your own efforts at advancing his tripe.

  • 22 xJane // Jun 28, 2010 at 11:53 am

    LOL. I approved this comment because it was so hilarious. May I rebut for the sake of pretending these are valid arguments?

    1. We are agreed: the US should affirm that it is a Muslim country to stop all terrorism against it rather than attempting to bring the freedoms we enjoy to greater recognition in the world.

    2. …This isn’t even an argument, just a statement of fact. Yup, Iran is anti-Isreal. Good point, that makes Obama a bad person.

    3. It’s a good thing this methodoly has been debunct, because it’s getting mighty warm around here.

    4. Iraq. I agree with you completely on this one: Iraq is so totally Obama’s fault, I can’t believe we reelected him. Oh, wait, I mean Bush.

    5. Ah, the old Cold War Is Back argument. Damn those commie bastards in Russia and Iran and…wait, Obama’s German?

    6. Honor killings, AIDS, sex trafficing: those are all problems that began on 19 January 2009. As is the 75% wage gap. Man, I wish someone would do something for woment.

    7. “the Muslim world laughs at Obama […] I truly believe Obama is Muslim”

    8. Fewer nuclear weapons in the world? How’s that for peace?

    File under: Feeding Trolls, Do Not. I never was any good at that.

  • 23 DCarley // Jun 28, 2010 at 1:53 pm

    Just like a good liberal robot to act like your saying something true and accurate while making fun of and ridiculing the other side. I would’ve expected nothing less from you. Thanks for being consistent with the rest of the looney left.

  • 24 xJane // Jun 28, 2010 at 2:40 pm

    You’re right, I should’ve left your arguments to ridicule themselves.

  • 25 John // Jun 28, 2010 at 2:43 pm

    DCarley, I think each of my original statements actually references/links to a news article, and was accurate in the time that I stated them. I qualify each one, and avoid making blanket, unsupportable assertions. I also avoid ad hominem attacks. I’m not automatically dismissive of arguments from the right–when they’re well-argued and backed with evidence.

    When you come into a forum broadly dismissing liberal “insanity” and linking Obama to Hitler, you do little to convince folks like me that conservatives are capable of engaging in reasoned, reasonable discourse. Fortunately, I know cons who can debate respectfully w/o parroting Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck.

  • 26 DCarley // Jun 28, 2010 at 6:22 pm

    First, I saw your links….all liberal or liberal-slanting…and all MSM do nothing but parrot the liberal talking points with no real truth or open dialogue.

    Second…”Announced Unequivocal End …”, “Thereby ending America’s bloodiest conflict since Vietnam…” are blanket statements. And they have never been really accuarte.

    Third…do you even know what ad hominem means? I in no way belittled you only your arguments, which are flawed….like you see mine. And if the arguments were valid or true when you posted them, but are no longer valid….remove them from your blog. Don’t leave them on your site for people to read unless you want to debate the truth.

    Fourth…I do apologize for linking Obama with Hitler. You are absolutely correct. That kind of off-the-cuff statement is factually wrong and correctly diminishes my credibility. Truthfully, no one should be compared to Hitler. Obama is a good moral person. It’s just his morals that bother me.

    Lastly, I never, ever come into another’s blog and broadly dismiss anyone. I never did that before and I did not do it here. I watch little to no TV so I rarely see Beck and I never listen to Rush Limbaugh on the radio. My ideas and points come from my own research…which includes reading the same papers or websites you listed such as the NY Times, Washington Post, Politico. However, I also access conservative sources such as Newsmax, World Net Daily, and Drudge Report. I also listen occasionally to Ed Shultz, as liberally insane as he is. Your statements that I “broadly dismissed” you, that I parrot Limbaugh and Beck, or your assertion (albeit indirectly) that I am a neo-con is actually a good example of ad hominem .

    I never intended to change your opinion or your views. I have learned just how impossible it is to change a brainwashed liberal. For the record…I am a moderate who believes in some of the ideas Obama has touted, some of the ideas and things Bush touted, and a lot of the ideas and policies Clinton accomplished. Aside from his moral failures, I liked Clinton. (If you lay aside all the dark secrets and suspicions surrounding him regarding all the people who died that were connected to him) But Obama is bad for the country, bad for free enterprise, bad for the US constitution, and ultimately bad for you and me. And he has not accomplished what you say he has.

    As a long-dead, unknown politician once stated, “It’s not that our liberal friends are so ignorant. It’s just that they know so much that isn’t true.”

  • 27 DCarley // Jun 28, 2010 at 6:38 pm

    Here are some current links that are accurate right now…….(if you will allow them to be posted)

    http://www.haaretz.com/blogs/focus-u-s-a/focus-u-s-a-the-u-s-will-have-to-confront-iran-or-give-up-the-middle-east-1.297931

    http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE65R5OU20100628?type=domesticNews&feedType=RSS&feedName=domesticNews

    http://www.danielpipes.org/5354/confirmed-barack-obama-practiced-islam

  • 28 Jackie G // Jun 29, 2010 at 4:15 pm

    This is to DCarley. You do everything that you accuse John of doing. He takes the high road and doesn’t call anyone names. He just tries to state the facts; and shows his sources clearly. Unlike you, he is courteous. You only ramble on about your uneducated opinions and insults for anyone you don’t agree with. Stifle the urge to spread your ignorance for the world to see.

  • 29 DCarley // Jun 29, 2010 at 6:27 pm

    Accuse? High road? State the facts? Uneducated opinions? Ramble on? Talk about ad hominem…! You are not reading what I am reading.

    Jackie – I stated before that I am neither a neo-conservative nor a Bushite. I never parrot the idiots on the right who accuse Obama of the things they do. However, they are usually right as far as truth goes. I have my own beliefs derived from my own research of various sources both liberal and conservative. One must listen to all sides if they are to make an educated stand for something.

    I am a Phd who is likely more educated (both academically and in life) than you, John, or his readers. I have presented arguments showing that John’s point positing that Obama has made the world more peaceful is inaccuarate and wrong. I showed that with my posted links last night.

    Anyone…who will allow another like me…to keep them going and agitated as you have been…must be easily offended and defensive. But truth will do that to those who deny truth or are ignorant. It does not need me to prop it up. Defend you views and/or refute my points (neither you nor John have done so yet). Don’t just write a paragraph about how the truth as I see it is ignorant.

    I also know when to admit when I am wrong, which I did last night. I would hope that you and John could do the same. Liberals usually can’t or won’t. Maybe you are different.

    If you have nothing of substance to add to the discussion of the subject matter, I would suggest you keep your views to yourself. Otherwise you risk losing any credibility you might have (at least with any readers who are truly open-minded). But you probably won’t do that either.

    Nonetheless, my strong suggestion is for you to “Stifle the urge to spread your ignorance for the world to see.”

  • 30 Jackie G // Jun 30, 2010 at 2:56 pm

    DCarley: My, aren’t you just so full of yourself? Full of it, more likely. You are lying about your education; unless that is you Mc Donald’s University- Oh, my! You must have majored in junk food for the mind. You neither show any evidence of even graduating from the eighth grade let alone having a (It is to laugh-HA! Ha!) PHD. Your writing lacks all of the qualities of an educated person; much less than that of a college alum Your writing skills, or lack thereof, tell me you are untruthful. By the way, how many languages do you speak? Barely one, I”d bet.

  • 31 Jackie G // Jun 30, 2010 at 3:40 pm

    I must apologize if I hurt anyone’s feelings. I am weary of people attacking President Obama without checking their facts. All anyone has to do is to check Mr. Obama’s track record while he was a U.S. senator. You can see the bills he worked on to pass and so on….. Now,to change the subject to the Gulf of Mexico. Does anyone know how many oil platforms are there? Well, I did some fact checking and there are 3,600! Not only that, but there have been 172 documented spills due to them of at least 2,100 gallons or more in the last ten years! Back in the late 70′s, when I was enrolled in a college economics class; we were assigned to do a paper on any subject that we felt affected the U.S. economy. I chose to do mine on alternative forms of energy other than oil. Before I took that class; OPEC was formed and they put the squeeze on everyone who needed their oil by stopping production artificially-or so we were told by the media. The price of gas went from about $.50/gallon to about $1.80/gallon. That jump in price really affected my family as well anyone who wasn’t rich. We really had to scrape by. It was a good thing I’m so good at math; it really paid off in my budgeting skills. I was shocked to find out while I was doing my research that the oil companies through their lobbyists had made it illegal in the state of California to research and development into any alternative forms of energy such as wind and or solar.It wasn’t a fancy library like at U.C.S.D. or anything. It was a small library at then Naval Air Station Miramar.

  • 32 Jackie G // Jun 30, 2010 at 4:14 pm

    This message is to inform anyone who really cares about finding the real news on what is going on in the world. What the American public is given as “news” on TV, the “newspapers”, magazines, and most radio “news” is nothing but tripe; to put it nicely. I learned this lesson when I was nine years old. My father was a career soldier. He was sent to places for thirteen months at a time and we couldn’t go along with. Dad went to places like Thailand and Korea. I asked him once why we couldn’t go. He said, “It’s war over there, Jackie”. I stated that it isn’t mentioned on the evening news. I remember to this day what he said,”They don’t tell you everything-only what they want you to know. And,boy howdy! That is especially true when there is a republican in office; like when GW’s regime illegally stole the White House. It seems those tax raises that were proposed by our current legally elected, President Obama, will only affect those with a single person’s income of $250,000.00 or more and, a joint income of $500,000.00. I’ll bet you that most of those irate people who are in the “tea party” don’t even come close to that or else they’d be at Disneyland enjoying themselves!

  • 33 John // Jun 30, 2010 at 6:23 pm

    DCarley and Jackie G, normally I’d try to get involved at this point, but I don’t have the time. I’m not going to delete comments, but I’m going to suggest that both of you are escalating this convo into something unproductive. Please, please, please, respect each other as individuals even if you can’t agree with each others’ ideas. Thank you.

  • 34 DCarley // Jun 30, 2010 at 8:20 pm

    Dear John – this will be my last comment on your blog. I rather enjoyed the bak-and-forth with you. I will not burden you any longer with having to decide whether to get involved in a exchange between two parties. that would not be fair to you.

    Jackie – You are an idiot (in the truest since of the word). I thought since you like to call people names, I would reciprocate. (For your simple mind – that means to return the gesture). I graduated with a Phd in Social Work in a well-known university in the midwest and I work full time in that field. I never eat at McDonald’s or gorge myself on “junk food for the mind.” You still have not refuted my points and I do not think you would even try. You just want to attack people, which is what true liberals do when they can’t hold their own in a discussion. And you are apparently very thin-skinned (kinda like Obama)

    Just so I can end this on a more civil note – please thank your father for his service to our country and thank you for being a family member who sacrificed your time with him so he could……

    Don’t mind responding….I will not be reading it.

  • 35 Jackie G // Jul 1, 2010 at 10:23 am

    John, I apologize. Bye to all.

  • 36 Rich P // Jul 2, 2010 at 1:09 am

    Obama has shares along with Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld in Baxter – the company which makes Tamiflu – which made billions in profit for them.

    Tamiflu killed my friend, who took it and after only two days died. He is one of many. He didn’t even have swine flu but just a seasonal one, but was coerced by his doctor, as they all make money from pushing these deadly drugs.

    The mark up on Tamiflu is 2000%. That’s more than arms dealing. All they have to do is push a massive campaign to spread fear. So yeah. Obama spreads fear to make money – he’s not such an amazing guy. He’s still in Afganistan. He’s still a puppet of the people behind him.

  • 37 Laszlo Toth, Jr // Jul 3, 2010 at 1:18 am

    “1. Our enemies will still torture and kill us and our soldiers because we are the infidels.”

    As a moral argument, this is extremely flawed. “If Johnny was to jump off the Empire State Building, would you jump off the Empire State Building?”

    “Those so-called torture methods help us to gather intelligence that helps us fight them before they get us.”

    According to whom? My sources from the US Army tell me that torture never works, and is in fact counter-productive. A tortured subject will tell you anything to stop the torture — all it does is generate false leads. One of my sources served in Iraq, and later trained approximately 10% of the Army’s interrogators while he was in the service.

    The only sources I’ve seen cited for the idea that torture is useful are civilians trying to gain political advantage for their position. No military interrogator I’ve spoken to believes it.

    “And as for closing Guantanamo…its still open….and some of the released prisoners are back fighting us again.”

    Let’s say I’m a landlord, and I give you today an eviction notice for Sept. 1st. Does the fact you still live there until Sept. 1st mean you haven’t been evicted?

    As to recidivism among former Guantánamo detainees — only 1 out of 7 have done that, according to official figures. That contrasts to a 2 out of 3 recidivism rate among the US prison population. If Guantánamo detainees are the “worst of the worst,” as we were told, this must be some new-found definition of “worst” I wasn’t previously aware of, given how much better they behave than common, everyday American criminals.

    I would go on, but refuting every factually incorrect statement you’ve asserted would be quite long and tedious. My point in this sample is to show that from the very start, you’ve done little else

    But, as a conservative, I must bring attention to this:

    “As a long-dead, unknown politician once stated, “It’s not that our liberal friends are so ignorant. It’s just that they know so much that isn’t true.””

    That would be Ronald Reagan, in 1964, in his broadcast TV speech opposing Medicare called “A Time for Choosing.”

    That you have such a low opinion of Reagan to characterize him this way shows to this conservative how sincere your points appear to be, especially when presented to make all conservatives appear like cartoonish caricatures. On behalf of reality-based conservatives everywhere, please: Stop helping us, and stop hurting both America and sincere conservatism everywhere.

  • 38 StevenX // Jul 20, 2010 at 9:05 pm

    What has President Obama done for us? You forgot: enacting the lowest tax rates since 1950, and the biggest tax cut….ever. Also saving the auto industry, the banking industry, and the US economy from total collapse (which, world leaders say, saved…the whole damn world economy). But don’t let the truth keep you from your Palin jerkoff sessions. She is counting on you to be an idiot. As for stock shares, would you be happy if he only invested in stuff that lost money? Proving he has good judgement isn’t exactly an insult, Cletus.

  • 39 Haley // Jul 21, 2010 at 9:40 am

    Okay so this is a little late but in response to George. . . who exactly is laughing at us?

    http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/11/05/international.press.reaction/index.html

    . . . Just sayin’

  • 40 Linda Ilog // Aug 7, 2010 at 6:24 pm

    Progress
    • The President signed the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act.
    • The President announced the “Making Home Affordable” home refinancing plan.
    • The President launched a $15 billion plan to boost lending to small businesses.
    • The President and Secretary Geithner announced the details of the Financial Stability Plan.
    • President Obama played a lead role in G-20 Summit that produced a $1.1 trillion deal to combat the global financial crisis.
    • The President signed the Fraud Enforcement and Recovery Act which gives the federal government more tools to investigate and prosecute fraud, from lending to the financial system, and creates a bipartisan Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission to investigate the financial practices that brought us to this point.
    • The President signed the Helping Families Save Their Homes Act, expanding on the Making Home Affordable Program to help millions of Americans avoid preventable foreclosures, providing $2.2 billion to help combat homelessness , and helping to stabilize the housing market for everybody.
    • The President signed the Credit Card Accountability, Responsibility, and Disclosure (CARD) Act to protect Americans from unfair and deceptive credit card practices.
    Civil Rights
    Progress
    • The President signed the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act, restoring basic protections against pay discrimination for women and other workers.
    Disabilities
    The President issued an Executive Order repealing the Bush-Era restrictions on embryonic stem cell research.
    The President signed the Christopher and Dana Reeve Paralysis Act, the first piece of comprehensive legislation aimed at improving the lives of Americans living with paralysis.

    Fiscal Responsibility
    Progress
    • The President signed an Executive Order on government contracting to fight waste and abuse.
    • The President launched Recovery.gov to track spending from the Recovery Act, an unprecedented step to provide transparency and accountability through technology.
    • The President wrote to the congressional leadership calling on them to pass statutory Pay-As-You-Go rules so that any new non-emergency tax cut or entitlement expansion offset in the budget.
    • The President signed the Weapons Systems Acquisition Reform Act to stop fraud and wasteful spending in the defense procurement and contracting system.
    Immigration
    Progress
    • The President signed the Children’s Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act, which provides quality health care to 11 million kids – 4 million who were previously uninsured — and removes barriers preventing legal immigrant children from being covered.
    • The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act provides over $400 million in funds to strengthen security and infrastructure for ports of entry on the Southwest border.
    Service
    Progress
    The President signed the Edward M. Kennedy Serve America Act, a hallmark piece of legislation.
    • The Serve America Act will increase the size of AmeriCorps from 75,000 volunteers to 250,000 by 2017.
    • The Act also creates a Social Innovation Fund that will invest in ideas that are proven to improve outcomes and “what works” funds in federal agencies to promote effective and innovative programs
    Taxes
    Progress
    The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act included a broad range of tax cuts aimed at making the tax code more fair and supporting the middle class:
    • 95% of all working families will receive a tax cut
    • 70% of the tax benefits goes to the middle 60% of American workers
    • 2 million families will be lifted out of poverty by the tax cuts in the Recovery Act
    • More than $150 billion in tax cuts will help low-income and vulnerable households during the economic recovery
    • About 1 Million jobs will be created or saved by these tax cuts alone
    Technology
    “To help build a new foundation for the 21st century, we need to reform our government so that it is more efficient, more transparent, and more creative.”
    -President Obama, April 25, 2009
    Progress
    • The President issued a Presidential Memorandum to the heads of executive departments and agencies ordering them to compile recommendations for an open government directive on transparency, participation, and collaboration in government.
    Urban
    Progress
    The President signed an Executive Order establishing the White House Office of Urban Affairs.
    The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act included broad support for urban communities.
    • To broaden access to affordable housing, the Act provides for $1 billion in increased funding for the Community Development Block Grant; $4 billion in increased public housing capital funds; $2 billion in payments to owners of project based rental assistance properties to keep them affordable; $2 billion in Neighborhood Stabilization Funds to purchase and rehabilitate forclosed homes; and $1.5 billion in Homelessness Prevention Funds to keep people in their homes;
    • To expand educational opportunity for low-income students, the Act provides for $13 billion in Title I funds to go to K-12 education in disadvantaged school systems;
    • To strengthen workforce development, the Act provides $3.95 billion in increased workforce investment training dollars to keep our workers skilled and to employ young people during the summer;
    • To improve energy efficiency, the Act increases the Weatherization Assistance Program by $5 billion, helping low income consumers save on their energy bills while simultaneously training more workers for a growing field;
    • To bolster our nation’s transportation infrastructure, the Act provides $1.5 billion in discretionary funding for the Department of Transportation to fund projects of regional or national significance as well as $8 billion to jumpstart high speed rail and connect regions to one another; and,
    • The Act also provides $4.7 billion to provide broadband access to underserved areas.

  • 41 Gracie // Aug 31, 2010 at 5:21 pm

    Speaking out against Obama should be a crime.When we finally have a good leader, that is doing what should be done, is making things right and is loved by ALL people, why would anyone question that? You don’t question things when they do well, you sit back , enjoy the right and take what you can get!

  • 42 John // Aug 31, 2010 at 8:40 pm

    Gracie, if your comment was meant as a sarcastic response to Linda’s fact-filled post, you’ve reduced your credibility through a slothful lack of rigor.

    Anyhow, I’m a liberal, and will happily critique Obama where I think his policies are failing or where I disagree with them. But I’ll do so with some measure of objectivity.

  • 43 JPXW // Sep 15, 2010 at 11:19 pm

    I think DCarley has the right idea, but wrong execution. Think about it this way for a moment please. If every country was a being, and each being was represented by its leader (which is 100% true in global politics as we are all judged (whether we like it or not) by our leader), how do we look? Nobody gives a flying poop about the people of a nation, especially not ours anymore. We fucked that whole thing up with Bush as president – so now we have 0 respect from any country who already doesn’t fear us for carrying guns with us everywhere. Most countries hate us because we as a people are entirely too weak, and view us as spoonfed retards with drool coming from an open mouth. Ask yourself, “Am I proud of this?” In this regard, you guys can stop flinging the blame at each other. We are the laziest, fattest, most self absorbed country in the entire world and have been for a very long time as a whole. This is my point, we are a WHOLE being judged based on our leader.
    Our leader is weak in as much as there are people in our country who think he is, including myself. A strong leader doesn’t have this happening because a strong leader is strong and shows it all the time and acts it all the time, and furthers what he thinks is best, not what others “paid” for.
    No matter how you slice it, Obama isn’t even able to execute his own ambitions to the fullest extent. Its time you guys got outta the cage and into the real world.
    Obama is merely a puppet, a puppet we all as a whole voted to be in office. The only reason, presidents get elected anymore is through campaign lobbying, therefore, depending on someone else to pay their bills much in the same way a gold digger does. The difference? None. The gold digger is gonna have sex with his/her partner, because they are basically being paid to do nothing but look pretty. Presidents and campaign contributors have the same relationship. Obama is getting raped up the anus by the people who funded him. Notably, the people who funded him happen to be green conscious, hence policy changes to the way we view and interact with our environment.
    Final point, if you can even bother to follow me on this, I say fuck you, and fuck all of us for living in this country that says its free, yet it has a price tag – debt. Obama doesn’t rule this country, money does. This is the only country where someone can make a song about toasting to the douchebags, the assholes and all the people we collectively don’t like, make a ton of money, be celebrated for this song so much that they go up on globally broadcast television, sing it, and then receive a standing ovation. Really? We have sunk so low that we are applauding those who mess with our chi? If you don’t know what I’m talking about, go watch the Kanye West performance at the VMA’s. Shame on all of us for even daring to support a country where this happens freely. It is this same weakness that makes people like Obama have to pretty much beg for money from people to pay for campaigns, which in turn only means that Obama owes someone – debt again. Open your eyes and realize, everything we have become, is not ok.
    Oh, and almost forgot. Last I heard, this country still calls communist leaders “pink”. Obama’s policies and what he preached on his campaign were in fact widely held communist beliefs. Does this mean that in addition to celebrating everything that makes us terrible people we are also becoming hypocrites by becoming communist? Why don’t we just drop the embargo, make Cuba and North Korea a part of us and declare Presidents’ Day the day we honor Hitler and Stalin? Why not? Better yet, lets nuke ourselves so we can wipe the earth clean of our terrible selves. I for one believe we are too much for this planet, there hasn’t been a war to dwindle our numbers in a very long time. In my opinion, its time for a whole lot of us to die. I don’t care if I’m one of them. I know I’m radical, I’m not out to go hurt anyone, but when kids started having babies when they were 16, and then when they were 12, I think the world got too overpopulated in areas. Of course, I am also a person who sees death as an opportunity to have more resources, I am completely devoid of emotion about death so whatever right?

  • 44 kp // Feb 17, 2011 at 1:05 pm

    How do you feel about your list now? Ha ha.
    A total disaster of a President. None of the above has come true for you useful idiots. Obama has single handedly destroyed our country and made us the laughing stock of the world.

  • 45 xJane // Mar 8, 2011 at 1:42 pm

    kp—I haven’t been reading much foreign press lately, how has Obama made the US a laughingstock?

  • 46 Linda Ilog // Mar 8, 2011 at 1:59 pm

    Get your facts right. When you can answer xjane in a way that is not disminating then you will get a response. Other than that I do not wnat to speak to anyone who can not prove facts. Obama did not make this mess, he just happen to be the one who get blamed for the mess. If you want something to laugh about find someone who agrees with you and you guys can laugh together. I guess the true facts does no matter if you mind is on fire. lol now that is what is funny.

  • 47 TopGun // Apr 11, 2011 at 4:16 am

    President Obama, has done far more than any other President in the US history. Good and bad! More good than bad, but you all already know this and for those of you who do not like him, do not like him because he has done something that makes it harder for you to live, but in the long run it saves us. Get over it already and stop weeping over you loss and praise him for having a set of balls to stand up to you regardless of losing your vote.

    People in support of President Obama have the right idea, because they know that true change come bad before it comes good. Fixing a dead economy and feeding it money to let it last has jump started a dead battery, that is giving more juice as time goes on, but at the same time life is becoming harder because success of the economy is living up. Yes people it is living up but it is dying as well. It is important for the living up part to continue so that the dying part will vanish into thin air….

    Patience is the only thing that has ever truly succeeded in making thing better, but America has lost that virtue due to President Bush

  • 48 Jeremy // Apr 12, 2011 at 8:44 am

    He is stupid and he is ruining this country. the reason were are so good with the islams is because he is a terrorist and he lovs Al Quade and His real name is Obama Bin Laden

  • 49 paulsur // Apr 21, 2011 at 5:35 pm

    1. hasnt happened
    2. hasnt happened
    3. hasnt happened
    4. hasnt happened
    5. hasnt happened
    6. hasnt happened
    7. hasnt happened
    8. hasnt happened
    Will you still vote for all this change in 2012, he-he :)

  • 50 ira // May 28, 2011 at 4:41 pm

    what ever happens i know Obama will still be are President in 2012 and bring change to this nation every day.

  • 51 al // Jun 19, 2011 at 8:51 pm

    thank you linda….

  • 52 Hank Waters // Jun 21, 2011 at 2:42 am

    LOL. It’s funny to see how after 2 1/2 years
    - gitmo is still open
    - secret prisons are open
    - We have no relations with Iran
    - Climate change is a joke and a way for more government control over the population
    - We still have soldiers being shot at in Iraq
    - We haven’t better relations with Russia, we’re a joke to the world
    - The core component of U.S. foreign policy should be ‘America first’ not ‘women’
    - “improved relations with the islamic world”???? Who are you trying to kid?
    - obama’s idea of limiting nuclear proliferation is for the U.S. to disarm unilaterally while nobody else do anything (Iran is still working on nuke development).
    - How many of our enemies have he met with and actually accomplished anything positive?

  • 53 luke herring // Nov 30, 2011 at 6:54 pm

    how is number 7 a good thing?

  • 54 lama21 // Dec 12, 2011 at 2:01 am

    well, i don’t know about everyone else, but i really love our commander in chief. he’s genuine, hard working, honest, and a true leader. it’s ok if he’s not cuddly loved by everyone for every minute he’s in office.

    we all know he is trying and trying and trying and trying to do the right thing.

    those Grand Old Party jerks are self-centered, outdated, and not really in love with this country. they are in love with selfish, white privileged class who really want nothing but to sit pretty without getting taxed. obama from the get-go has been right all along – not his fault the republicans are in gridlock on so many things, not wanting to play with everyone else (holding tightly onto the security of greed while hiding behind ‘jesus’==gimmee a break).

    john, i think obama is doing so great for the mess he inherited. and i want him to be president forever. he’s gonna get reelected.

    and even if i wanted obama to stay president forever, he has the courage (actually – he doesn’t even need that) – he has the natural personality to say, ‘no thank you because those are not the rules – someone else must run for office and i must step down’.

    it’s called integrity and vision. too bad the gop candidates have very little of either one of those things.

    well, i’m not smart. i’m mentally an ‘occupier’ in thinking. i support barack obama forever.

    help me out john – are my old instincts correct? my wife loves him, too.

  • 55 lama21 // Dec 12, 2011 at 2:06 am

    PS–i think people who say negative things about him on this here post say it because they have deep, south racist issues in them they can’t shake. these same mean-spirit monster-hole-in-their-empty-hearts make comments that they never researched to make a claim.

    but i still think they are just plain racist and still can’t stand that a black man is president.

    when u get down to it – maybe that’s why people say mean things.

    also, i don’t see these same douche lords (paulsur, for example) running for any president him/herself. (Laughing out loud!). they just like to say mean stuff on blogs from around the world because they hate black people, which is really a sign of how despicable they feel about themselves…

    don’t you think that’s right, mr. john?

  • 56 bob // Dec 25, 2011 at 8:19 am

    Wake up liberal morons. None of your facts are true. Obama is the worst president we have had. Since he’s been in office he’s ruined the economy, dropped our rating to AA, increased unemployment, spent 5 trillion dollars and accomplished nothing. Seriously read some history and do some research instead of listening to liberal propaganda and believing every word.

  • 57 xJane // Jan 5, 2012 at 5:11 pm

    bob: Are we talking about the same president? The one named “Barack”, rather than the one named “George”…? Because it seems to me that most of what you’re complaining about happened in the prior administration and President Obama is dealing with the fallout. We can debate how well he’s dealing with the fallout, but I don’t think you can put any of this at his feet.

  • 58 xJane // Jan 5, 2012 at 5:14 pm

    lama21: I think it can be difficult to criticize a president of color without being branded a racist (correctly or incorrectly) and I welcome debates about policy and facts (rather than ad hominem attacks or mere assertions).

    That said, I recently had a discussion with a friend about how little we hear about assassination attempts and how we’re almost certain that they’re being under-reported, lest those who simply can’t stand the thought of a black man as president be emboldened by the attempts of like-minded individuals. (We agreed that the same would be the case if we had a female president, though perhaps not to the same degree.)

  • 59 xJane // Jan 5, 2012 at 5:16 pm

    John: More than two years on, I’d be interested in hearing a follow-up to your positions here. I’ve personally been disappointed with his position on torture, indefinite detention, &c.

Leave a Comment