Religion, SF, and Other Speculative Fictions.


Mind on Fire random header image

On the Relative Lack of Genetic Diversity in our Species.

Posted by John on January 19th, 2009 at 11:52 am · 8 Comments

Just learned that human genetic diversity is pretty low compared with many species, especially other homonids.  It is said that one chimpanzee tribe has more genetic variation than the entire human species.  One possible cause for this was a catastrophic supervolcanic event some 75,000 years ago, which may have reduced our own species to as few as a thousand breeding pairs and helped to wipe out all human branches except for h. sapiens and h. neandertalis.

This raises all sorts of questions and concerns, from the philosophical to biological:

  • This really makes the differences we see in each other due to race, culture, ideology seem very superficial.
  • Do we have enough diversity to survive a highly virile and fatal disease?
  • And what about these supervolcanoes? Apparently Americans have one right in our backyard–rather, in our living room: the Yellowstone Caldera, which is active and erupts once every 650,000 to 700,000 years or so. From what I can gather from the US Geological Survey site, if the last one, from 640,000 years ago, were repeated, it would obliterate (for human purposes) most of Wyoming, Montana, Idaho and northern Utah and cover the states West of the Mississippi River in at least a couple of inches of ash.
  • If there is a divine creator, this would add more evidence to the “god sucks” category.  But you know, now that I think about it, this isn’t much different from the whole Flood thing (how many breeding pairs accompanied Noah?)

Anyhow, I find this both scary and fascinating.  Does this knowledge provoke any questions or thoughts in you?

Tags: Uncategorized

8 responses so far ↓

  • 1 Steve // Jan 20, 2009 at 3:04 pm

    That knowledge provokes a lot of things- a little irrational fear, perhaps, but most of all, wonder. I mean, how amazing is it that we can determine such information? How awesome is it that even faced with a catastrophe like that, enough breeding pairs of us survived to become what we are now? How crazy is it that we could be wiped out so easily?

    Pretty freaking wondrous, if you ask me.

  • 2 xJane // Jan 21, 2009 at 2:14 pm

    I have to say that we may not have much, but we appear to have enough. And as evidence of this fact, I present every mixed race child on the planet. They are hot! Objectively speaking, mixing up the diversity is very clearly useful for the species as a whole.

    Another thing that comes to mind is the circle species, which we studied in biology—these are one species, spread around a large area (say, a lake) and they are separated in to “races”; each race mates with those closest in proximity to it but does not recognize as being the same species the races that are across from it (like the noon and 6 positions on a clock). This suggests to me that biological races are different from human (social) races. That really, we may not be separated into races the way we think we are.

  • 3 John // Jan 21, 2009 at 8:56 pm

    Steve, I’m with you on the wonder!

  • 4 John // Jan 21, 2009 at 8:57 pm

    xJane, I’m with you on the whole mixed-race hotness thing. :P

  • 5 xJane // Jan 21, 2009 at 9:58 pm

    lol! I don’t think you’re impartial on this one…nor is Jana, for the record ;)

  • 6 jana // Jan 21, 2009 at 9:59 pm

    xJane: Race is such a slippery concept to me, I’m never quite sure how comfortable I am with terms like “mixed race.” But even so, I do enjoy the fact that most people would describe my (HOT) lover as ‘mixed race’ and certainly my gorgeous kids could be classified that way, too. Unfortunately I’ve got the bland end of the gene pool in my family tree (sigh).

  • 7 xJane // Jan 22, 2009 at 8:30 am

    I agree—I’m mixed Irish & French, but somehow, that doesn’t count in quite the same way. I guess it’s more of a continental mixing…

  • 8 JohnW // Jan 23, 2009 at 4:32 pm

    Hybrid Vigor!!!

Leave a Comment