<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Spark: Loving</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mindonfire.com/2008/05/15/spark-loving/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mindonfire.com/2008/05/15/spark-loving/</link>
	<description>Religion, SF, and Other Speculative Fictions.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 00:24:04 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: xJane</title>
		<link>http://www.mindonfire.com/2008/05/15/spark-loving/comment-page-1/#comment-17822</link>
		<dc:creator>xJane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 02:36:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mindonfire.com/2008/05/15/spark-loving/#comment-17822</guid>
		<description>Tammy (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mindonfire.com/2008/05/15/on-marriage-or-whatever/#comment-17823&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;cross posted&lt;/a&gt;) thanx for the link. It&#039;s a must-read. I think it&#039;s telling that the judges emphasized the fact that they didn&#039;t &lt;i&gt;necessarily&lt;/i&gt; agree with their own ruling (although it does make me wonder which side they sympathize with), only that the &lt;i&gt;law&lt;/i&gt; supports the ruling. All this bandying-about of the term &quot;activist judges&quot; (which I&#039;m sure we&#039;ll be hearing soon enough to relate to these judges) has had a chilling effect on the judicial profession.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tammy (<a href="http://www.mindonfire.com/2008/05/15/on-marriage-or-whatever/#comment-17823" rel="nofollow">cross posted</a>) thanx for the link. It&#8217;s a must-read. I think it&#8217;s telling that the judges emphasized the fact that they didn&#8217;t <i>necessarily</i> agree with their own ruling (although it does make me wonder which side they sympathize with), only that the <i>law</i> supports the ruling. All this bandying-about of the term &#8220;activist judges&#8221; (which I&#8217;m sure we&#8217;ll be hearing soon enough to relate to these judges) has had a chilling effect on the judicial profession.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tammy Takahashi</title>
		<link>http://www.mindonfire.com/2008/05/15/spark-loving/comment-page-1/#comment-17818</link>
		<dc:creator>Tammy Takahashi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 01:16:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mindonfire.com/2008/05/15/spark-loving/#comment-17818</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s an interesting analysis of today&#039;s ruling:

http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2008/05/15/california/index.html

Yay for CA!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s an interesting analysis of today&#8217;s ruling:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2008/05/15/california/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2008/05/15/california/index.html</a></p>
<p>Yay for CA!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xJane abroad</title>
		<link>http://www.mindonfire.com/2008/05/15/spark-loving/comment-page-1/#comment-17811</link>
		<dc:creator>xJane abroad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 19:53:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mindonfire.com/2008/05/15/spark-loving/#comment-17811</guid>
		<description>wow, I hadn&#039;t heard that. &lt;i&gt;awesome&lt;/i&gt;!

...I mean, of course, that&#039;s exactly what I meant when I posted it today :-p</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow, I hadn&#8217;t heard that. <i>awesome</i>!</p>
<p>&#8230;I mean, of course, that&#8217;s exactly what I meant when I posted it today :-p</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elaine</title>
		<link>http://www.mindonfire.com/2008/05/15/spark-loving/comment-page-1/#comment-17809</link>
		<dc:creator>Elaine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 18:58:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mindonfire.com/2008/05/15/spark-loving/#comment-17809</guid>
		<description>Late?  Maybe.  But quite appropriate in light of today&#039;s ruling by the California Supreme Court striking down the law that prohibits same-sex marriages in California, and in a fairly definitive way according to the reports I&#039;ve heard.

In a sort of echo of &quot;separate-but-equal&quot; issues, the decision among other things says that &quot;civil unions&quot; just aren&#039;t enough to provide equal protection under the law for gays.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Late?  Maybe.  But quite appropriate in light of today&#8217;s ruling by the California Supreme Court striking down the law that prohibits same-sex marriages in California, and in a fairly definitive way according to the reports I&#8217;ve heard.</p>
<p>In a sort of echo of &#8220;separate-but-equal&#8221; issues, the decision among other things says that &#8220;civil unions&#8221; just aren&#8217;t enough to provide equal protection under the law for gays.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->