<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Because some religious slurs are okay</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mindonfire.com/2008/03/06/because-some-religious-slurs-are-okay/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mindonfire.com/2008/03/06/because-some-religious-slurs-are-okay/</link>
	<description>Religion, SF, and Other Speculative Fictions.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 14:34:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: wren</title>
		<link>http://www.mindonfire.com/2008/03/06/because-some-religious-slurs-are-okay/comment-page-1/#comment-12968</link>
		<dc:creator>wren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 23:02:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mindonfire.com/2008/03/06/because-some-religious-slurs-are-okay/#comment-12968</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s just you. And we see where your mind is today!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s just you. And we see where your mind is today!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jana (aka pilgrimgirl)</title>
		<link>http://www.mindonfire.com/2008/03/06/because-some-religious-slurs-are-okay/comment-page-1/#comment-12967</link>
		<dc:creator>Jana (aka pilgrimgirl)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 22:58:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mindonfire.com/2008/03/06/because-some-religious-slurs-are-okay/#comment-12967</guid>
		<description>Okay, my hands can&#039;t type.  I mean, &quot;Some religious sluts are okay.&quot;  Damn fingers....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, my hands can&#8217;t type.  I mean, &#8220;Some religious sluts are okay.&#8221;  Damn fingers&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jana (aka pilgrimgirl)</title>
		<link>http://www.mindonfire.com/2008/03/06/because-some-religious-slurs-are-okay/comment-page-1/#comment-12966</link>
		<dc:creator>Jana (aka pilgrimgirl)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 22:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mindonfire.com/2008/03/06/because-some-religious-slurs-are-okay/#comment-12966</guid>
		<description>everytime I read the title for this post, I see it as &quot;come religious sluts are okay.&quot;  I don&#039;t know why.  Is it just me or have others seen that, too?
:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>everytime I read the title for this post, I see it as &#8220;come religious sluts are okay.&#8221;  I don&#8217;t know why.  Is it just me or have others seen that, too?<br />
 <img src='http://www.mindonfire.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xJane</title>
		<link>http://www.mindonfire.com/2008/03/06/because-some-religious-slurs-are-okay/comment-page-1/#comment-12803</link>
		<dc:creator>xJane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 18:40:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mindonfire.com/2008/03/06/because-some-religious-slurs-are-okay/#comment-12803</guid>
		<description>lol! good call, Rich</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol! good call, Rich</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich</title>
		<link>http://www.mindonfire.com/2008/03/06/because-some-religious-slurs-are-okay/comment-page-1/#comment-12794</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 01:08:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mindonfire.com/2008/03/06/because-some-religious-slurs-are-okay/#comment-12794</guid>
		<description>One aspect of the whole Muslim accusation thing that I don&#039;t hear discussed much is, wouldn&#039;t it be a huge help to our mid-east foreign policy if we actually had a Muslim in the white house?  Or at least someone who was sympathetic to, or demonstrated knowledge of Islamic culture?  Instead of the ignorant,  saber-rattling dolt-in-residence who has only exacerbated our foreign relations problems?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One aspect of the whole Muslim accusation thing that I don&#8217;t hear discussed much is, wouldn&#8217;t it be a huge help to our mid-east foreign policy if we actually had a Muslim in the white house?  Or at least someone who was sympathetic to, or demonstrated knowledge of Islamic culture?  Instead of the ignorant,  saber-rattling dolt-in-residence who has only exacerbated our foreign relations problems?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wren</title>
		<link>http://www.mindonfire.com/2008/03/06/because-some-religious-slurs-are-okay/comment-page-1/#comment-12700</link>
		<dc:creator>wren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 06:56:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mindonfire.com/2008/03/06/because-some-religious-slurs-are-okay/#comment-12700</guid>
		<description>This is a frequent topic on the listservs for MN supporters.  I now reside in the congressional district of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.keithellison.org/index.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Keith Ellison&lt;/a&gt; who is, as far as I know, the only Muslim in the US congress and &lt;a href=&quot;http://flickr.com/photos/waitingline/2239354358/in/set-72157600038671430/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;an Obama supporter&lt;/a&gt;.

The distancing thing is weird, isn&#039;t it?  Remember the whole Seinfeld thing about not being gay? &lt;i&gt;&quot;Not that there&#039;s anything wrong with that.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;    There have been a few celebrities who flat out won&#039;t answer the question when asked what their orientation is because they say it is irrelevant. Whether they say it to stay in the closet or to underscore the nosiness of the question, it&#039;s perhaps, the right thing to do.   I&#039;d say it takes a secure person to do that.   No matter how open minded we are,  we don&#039;t want to be misidentified - &lt;i&gt;not that there&#039;s anything wrong with that&lt;/i&gt;. 

Of course religion is a whole other ball of wax, can of worms, whatever.   On one hand I think what&#039;s being done is good - calling it what it is - fearmongering.  But there is that next step - a bold one - to say &quot;America, what is even sadder than politicians trying to scare you into thinking I&#039;m a Muslim is that many of you are scared because you think I&#039;m a Muslim.&quot;

But then this isn&#039;t the first religion mudslinging that has went on in this primary season; ask Mitt.  In my lds days I often defended the outlandish aspects   to other Christians by pointing out all the outlandish aspects of Christianity in general.   

 I suppose the  boldest  statement a politician could make would be to say religions at their best provide us with a sense of community and at their worst harm others.  Ultimately, they&#039;re all founded by different people who offer conflicting claims that &lt;i&gt;their&lt;/i&gt; way is the right way and science has yet to prove there&#039;s a god in another realm so maybe people should take a little more allegorical and less literal approach to religion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a frequent topic on the listservs for MN supporters.  I now reside in the congressional district of <a href="http://www.keithellison.org/index.php" rel="nofollow">Keith Ellison</a> who is, as far as I know, the only Muslim in the US congress and <a href="http://flickr.com/photos/waitingline/2239354358/in/set-72157600038671430/" rel="nofollow">an Obama supporter</a>.</p>
<p>The distancing thing is weird, isn&#8217;t it?  Remember the whole Seinfeld thing about not being gay? <i>&#8220;Not that there&#8217;s anything wrong with that.&#8221;</i>    There have been a few celebrities who flat out won&#8217;t answer the question when asked what their orientation is because they say it is irrelevant. Whether they say it to stay in the closet or to underscore the nosiness of the question, it&#8217;s perhaps, the right thing to do.   I&#8217;d say it takes a secure person to do that.   No matter how open minded we are,  we don&#8217;t want to be misidentified &#8211; <i>not that there&#8217;s anything wrong with that</i>. </p>
<p>Of course religion is a whole other ball of wax, can of worms, whatever.   On one hand I think what&#8217;s being done is good &#8211; calling it what it is &#8211; fearmongering.  But there is that next step &#8211; a bold one &#8211; to say &#8220;America, what is even sadder than politicians trying to scare you into thinking I&#8217;m a Muslim is that many of you are scared because you think I&#8217;m a Muslim.&#8221;</p>
<p>But then this isn&#8217;t the first religion mudslinging that has went on in this primary season; ask Mitt.  In my lds days I often defended the outlandish aspects   to other Christians by pointing out all the outlandish aspects of Christianity in general.   </p>
<p> I suppose the  boldest  statement a politician could make would be to say religions at their best provide us with a sense of community and at their worst harm others.  Ultimately, they&#8217;re all founded by different people who offer conflicting claims that <i>their</i> way is the right way and science has yet to prove there&#8217;s a god in another realm so maybe people should take a little more allegorical and less literal approach to religion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
