
on Daylight Savings Time
Posted by xJane on October 29th, 2007 at 7:32 pm · 1 Comment
I’ve heard arguments for and against DST and the reasons generally center around “we’re used to it” or “we’re not farmers”. Recently I heard that the Candy Lobby (there’s a lobby for everything, it seems, and all of them have more votes than me) wants DST to occur before Hallowe’en so that kids can go eat candy while it’s still light out. Which defeats the purpose of going out, in my mind (part of the fun of Hallowe’en is that it’s dark out—it’s scary, it’s not something you’re normally allowed to do, &c.), but ignores a major point: standardization isn’t.
What I mean is that, from coast to coast we have, what, four “time zones” that range from part of a state to more than 5 states wide, are subject to the whim of local governments (sometimes down to townships), and have no basis in reality beyond the fact that someone “really” took a pen and drew a line. From edge to edge of one time zone the sun could rise & set up to an hour earlier or later. That is not standardization, in my book. Even more dramatic, however, is the north-to-south change. I live in LA and can discern longer and shorter days by maybe about an hour over the whole year. When I lived in Seattle, we lost a good four hours of daylight every winter. That’s not something that will be fixed by DST.
I think we should just admit that our time zones have no basis in the amount of time it takes the sun to rise & set, or how long it takes the earth to orbit, and move on with our lives. Our current lives are so far removed from any relationship to natural rhythms anyway and whether or not I agree with that, I think it’s time to admit it and sever any nods to “saving daylight”.
I like having some night in my life in the winter: coming home to a darkened courtyard has some romance under an October moon (more on that later) and it reminds me that there have been changes, time has moved on, even if I’ve no crops to help drive home that point.
Tags: Politics