A friend & cousin of mine & I were talking the other night. He’s about to graduate and I was being a annoying dult at him: “what will you do after graduation?” “will you go into the kinds of industries your major implies?” and the like. I told him he could be a marine! jokingly, since his twin joined the marines a few years ago. That got us into talking about what drives people to do things like that. His younger brother just joined up. I can’t imagine what his mom is going through. Freaking out most likely, like she did the first time around.
I started this post a few months ago & managed to lose all but that first paragraph. The next few times I tried to finish it, I ended up deleting everything because I came across (even to myself) as much more inflammatory and, you know, “anti-American” than I intended/am. But today, I heard an NPR story about post-traumatic stress in recent vets. This is one of my biggest concerns about the war in Iraq: the injurious fallout.
I am not against war or violence. I actually find a lot of comfort in the archetype of Warrior. I like the Klingon motto “today is a good day to die”; I like showing off my judo bruises when I have them (except this week, they were not honorably obtained, so they embarrass me); I tend toward aggression when I experience just about any strong emotion (judo is my cure for broken glasses); I think a combination of Israel’s & Germany’s military service requirements is a very good idea; I think women should be drafted. And, I Support The TroopsTM. Which is to say, I’m against this war; I think buying a Hummer is treason; and I believe that, when you ride alone, you ride with bin Laden (although, I ride alone often, so I’m as much a hypocrite as the SUV next to me with a yellow ribbon).
I hang out with a lot of people who are either in the military or used to be. My path never took me that direction for a variety of reasons, but I respect the people whose paths do go in that direction. That said, the people who actually get deployed and who come back, always come back different.
War injuries are not limited to the deployed parties; post-traumatic stress can inflict the families of those who come back or who don’t. And it’s one of the most insidious injuries. A vet who has lost a leg is obviously injured, but one who “only” has PTSD sometimes is not even aware of it. And what that person does because of the PTSD has effects on their friends & family.
Every time I hear about PTSD, I think of my judo-brother, who returned from Afghanistan a few months ago. He took over instruction for the day & I had many honorable bruises after the longest hour-and-a-half of my life… Then, he gave out gifts he brought back, including hippos for my sister (who collects them, but how do you find hippos in Afghanistan ‽). And then…he disappeared. I had more fear of him being dead in the two months that we heard nothing from him than in the whole time he was deployed. Something he said to us as he was talking about his experiences (in a very superficial way) has stuck with me. He was discussing a debriefing about PTSD. He was told that it affects everyone and in ways that are unpredictable. Then he explained how he experienced it: seeing someone with a turban or in a veil, and wanting to kill them. My fear is not that he will act on that urge, although it’s possible that he may. My fear is simply that he has it at all. As much as I admire the Warrior, archetypal or embodied, war fucks people up.






4 responses so far ↓
1 John White // Jun 28, 2007 at 4:34 pm
Klingon?! Isn’t that a quote from Crazy Horse?
PTSD is why I thought that First Blood was the best Rambo movie.
2 Miko // Jun 28, 2007 at 6:51 pm
could be…according to the internet, yes, simply popularized by the Klingons. I heard it first on Star Trek (not even the original one).
3 Jonathan // Jun 29, 2007 at 5:54 am
I’m with you 100% about admiring the Warrior archetype. It closely resembles a post you did previously on the subject of the Hero. What discourages me is why the transition for a real person into the role of the Warrior is brutal to their mind. Is there anything that can prepare a person for this transition? How do they recover?
All societies need people to fill this role, both in a material and spiritual context, so it isn’t that it’s a bad thing to be - it’s absolutely necessary to have people in society who are brave and willing to fight to sustain it. But for some reason, it brings with it the burden of serious mental demons. The warrior in reality fights on two fronts - the spiritual and the material. The mistake may be not realizing that the battle in the mind is the much harder one to fight, one that does not go away when the material battlefield has long ago been left behind.
I just saw Flags of our fathers. It was heartbreaking to see the mental anguish of the men that returned from war - one that they never seemed to get over. My question will always be… why?
4 Miko // Jun 29, 2007 at 12:42 pm
Jonathan: I think you hit the nail on the head. The battle that happens within requires a strength of being that we don’t train our soldiers for. We train them for strength of body, not mind/soul. I wonder if it’s even possible to train that kind of strength.
The other issue I have with war is the dehumanization of the enemy. And I wonder whether this doesn’t cause some of the aftermath. I suppose dehumanizing the enemy is the easiest way to make it easy to kill, but is there some way that respects the personhood of the enemy while still being able to pull the trigger? Would it end up making it easier or harder to recover (emotionally) from?
Leave a Comment